I conclude this article by explicating several recent German approaches to the Nachlass which I think can offer a new possible approach.Ībel, Günter: Nietzsche: Die Dynamik der Willen zur Macht und die ewige Wiederkehr, Berlin 1998 Search in Google ScholarĪgell, Fredrik: Die Frage nach dem Sinn des Lebens: Über Erkenntnis und Kunst im Denken Nietzsches, Munich 2006 Search in Google ScholarĪlderman, Harold: “Nietzsche’s Nachlass: A Reply to Henry Walter Brann”, International Philosophical Quarterly 13.4 (1973), 551–552 Search in Google ScholarĪnsell-Pearson, Keith: An Introduction to Nietzsche as Political Thinker: The Perfect Nihilist, Cambridge 1999 Search in Google ScholarĪnsell-Pearson, Keith: “Guide to Further Reading”, in On the Genealogy of Morality and Other Writings, ed. I then argue that the first option is impossible given historical evidence. I argue that we must either offer necessary and sufficient conditions for a piece of text being Nachlass, or we ought to abandon such abstract criteria altogether and embrace a contextual and historical approach. Each of these criteria pick out a different set of texts as “ Nachlass.” Thus, despite the veneer of agreement, the most broadly accepted methodological approach in the Anglo-American tradition of Nietzsche scholarship is applied inconsistently. However, there are no agreed upon necessary and sufficient conditions of a particular textual object being considered “ Nachlass.” This absence leads to implicit and often tacit value demarcation criteria that can be broadly grouped into four types of consideration: publication, authorization, publicness, and audience. It attempts to demarcate between the published works and the Nachlass. Based on a review of the literature and historical evidence, I argue that the use of the methodological principle known as the priority principle in Anglo-American Nietzsche scholarship is inconsistent and irreconcilable with historical evidence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |